Eastern philosophies such as Taoism and Buddhism thought “darkness” could be seen as a necessary part of life’s expansion and growth. Self-reliance is a voice for solitude, where the First Amendment can be detrimental to healing trauma that does not make someone “crazy.”
I’ve shared my experiences, as have others throughout United States history, documenting our stories as civilians, active government officials, or retired government officials. A reader can find these stories in history books, philosophy, psychology, sociology, and anthropology research; personal experience can carry baggage in battling darkness.
The Central Intelligence Agency released a research document on an analysis and assessment of the Gateway Process, dated June 9, 1983. The U.S. Army Operational Group states the gateway and hemi-sync theory of consciousness is a paradox to expressing personal experiences using kundalini psychosis or transcendence.
As an artist writing this piece, I’ve met my share of misguided individuals who have believed my voice needs to be silent. I don’t slander or defame anyone. I don’t hold power against any individual or government.
I provide supporting evidence of personal experiences, statistical data, and a thought process dually researched by military physicists. There is always a radical deception of what the First Amendment means in civilian life by government officials. The context of such an amendment can hold a barrier not exceeding a false statement of imprisonment, trafficking, mental health, disability, survivors, and achievers healing trauma.
My voice is a response to living in taught behavior as a nonverbal child obedient to silence. I have practiced kundalini transcendence meditation since 2016, and it has become a useful part of my voice when using my First Amendment right to share discrepancies within my growth and healing journey as it should be for all human existence and development, as well as the gateway and hemi-sync theory.
I want to acknowledge James Madison, who wrote in the amendments as a solution to limit government power and protect individual liberties through the Constitution. As follows:
The First Amendment of the United States Constitution protects the following rights: Freedom of speech,, the; and the right to express oneself through speech, including in the arts and entertainment; Freedom of the press, the right to express oneself through publication and dissemination; Freedom of religion, the right to practice one’s religion without government interference; Freedom of assembly, the right to peacefully assemble, Right to petition: The right to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
Here are examples of opposing rebellion of the First Amendment:
Example one: The killing of Ahmad Arbery in Georgia, where three white supremacists said they were using taught behavior and their First Amendment right to end his life.
Example two: Hearing people speak with misguidance to harm, sexually harass, sell drugs, commit assault, and attempt murder because it is their First Amendment right.
Example three: I can share an experience with an official in my hometown who has property. He emailed me, stating I owed him. He can enter my apartment anytime he wants to because he helped me. This was followed by repeated harassment and sexual harassment by others as well. There would also be the matter of illegally putting cameras and voice recorders (wires in my walls) in my apartment while damaging my water pipes. Also threatening my life in emails, phone calls, enforced hospitalization, and police officers being used in a vicious game.
Example four: Government officials violated the color of law by intentionally creating a false case against a civilian, imprisoning me under false abuse cases. Also, the matter of having access to my mental health services using their positions to threaten people and forging my signature on documents.
Example five: Matter of the Department of Justice, FBI, U.S. Marshals, or police not investigating properly when other government officials, especially in military service, stalk civilians. In this process, there should be a thin line against each other when harm is created under false narratives about civilians.
Example six: Bribes and blackmail go far while using mental health and disability community-threatening nonprofits. The true nature of government and law enforcement is supposed to protect ‘We the people,’ especially when there is harm against a civilian. Is this false under the First Amendment right?
Example seven: The reason I know my rights is not because I’m a rebel or uncontrollable; fearless. I grew up with a family in the government and individuals who knew of their misdoings; the good government introduced me to the color of law. Educational tools are used when government officials answer to someone in authority, especially when holding their positions. We, the people, have a right to report government official’s misdeeds under their law.
A theory and hypothesis: There is a distinction between voicing my concerns as a civilian and addressing the right to petition the government for a redress of grievances using my civil rights. As we, the people, lead with our hearts, there is no infringement to be a catalyst for our constitutional liberties. Our forefathers have written fairness, and this is the foundation for our First Amendment rightfully without subjecting to criminal “empires.”
Lastly, the reader may be thinking about why I have shared this First Amendment, which is not subjective, as a theory and hypothesis to survive. Individuals in the government assume a position believing their mental health is greater than civilians. Government officials must start reading their own released documents, such as the Central Intelligence Agency’s released research.
